REFERENCE COMPONENTS- DIGITAL SOURCESDIGITAL SOURCESUPDATED APRIL 2. INTRODUCTION FEBRUARY 2. UPDATEMARCH 2. 01. UPDATEJUNE 2. 01. UPDATEMUSIC SERVER VS. CD/SACDJANUARY 2. UPDATEJUNE 2. 00. UPDATEDECEMBER 2. UPDATETHE FALL 2. DIGITAL . I actually have much more experience with digital LPs than CDs. The digital components I am most familiar with have mainly been very modest in price. Fortunately for all of us, my associates have had some relevant and extensive experience with Digital Sources and they are quite generous in sharing that information. ![]() Digital's Areas of Superiority. It would be foolish and ignorant to ignore Digital's superiority to Analog in a number of sonic parameters: Precision, outer detail, speed stability, noise and overall purity. Unfortunately, it also subtracts those aspects of the sound which are the vital essence of music; the conveyor of individuality and emotions. That is why Digital, at present, is more intellectually than emotionally satisfying. This is especially true for those audiophiles who are very familiar with excellent analog sound. Judd Trump held off a determined Ali Carter to reach the Ladbrokes Players Championship final with a 6-4 victory in Llandudno. The win sees Trump reach his fifth. 1967 Mustang Fastback Factory 390/S Code Brittany Blue/4 Speed with Factory AC No engine or transmission She's missing some parts but it's an excellent candidate for. It’s great that Wonder Woman is getting a special Multiverse event in Injustice 2 to celebrate the release of Wonder Woman in theaters. But, in the dysfunctional. ![]() How NOT to completely ruin your kitchen remodel: lessons learned to end up with a room you love! ![]() When Someone Thinks That It’s Okay To Keep Disappointing You But Not Others. Er No It’s Not. May 2, 2012 By NATALIE Reading Time: 5 Minutes. However I, an analog- oriented audiophile at present, still believe that at some point in the future, digital will be superior overall to analog, and even possibly in every single way, and I look forward to that day. Optimizing Digital Components. IMPORTANT ADVICE: Never turn off any* digital equipment. It usually takes around 2 days of playing for it to . Once turned off, you have to go through the entire cycle all over again. Accordingly, do not judge digital equipment unless it has been on and operating for at least 4. This is true for even . The rarity of some tubes and the high cost of replacements may offset any sonic benefits. Audio Magazines and Digital Components. What about the audio magazines? Hardly. This is what one reader wrote to me concerning the magazines' . It is consistent with the methodology and routines the audio magazines typically employ. In short.. Audio 'reviewers' will never utilize an objective tool to analyze and judge the performance of equipment or accessories. Why not? This prerequisite would then compromise their present ability to praise and . This in turn would mean.. The 'reviewers' wouldn't be able to help their . Of course, the utilization of objective tools would be very useful to their paying readers, but that is obviously very irrelevant to them, judging by their own actions. Top. An Audio Earthquake (For Me).. NOW ADDED TO CLASS A (UPPER) DIGITAL SOURCESAPL NWO- Master (Esoteric UX- 1. Pi) CD/SACD/DVD- A Player. I've delayed writing this for months now, but I've run out of excuses, so here it is: After more than 3 decades of false hopes and frustration, I've finally heard a digital source that I actually enjoy listening to and, importantly, without a serious and disqualifying regret that it wasn't analog instead. First some important background.. My Earliest Digital Experiences. I can still remember the first time I ever heard a digital recording. I believe it was on a CBC station playing Beethoven's 9th Symphony, recorded in Japan. At the time, I was really excited about hearing something that was supposed to be superior to anything else I had experienced, but it didn't take long for me to become profoundly disappointed. The sound reminded me of mediocre solid- state amplification, with washed out harmonics and a thin, dry analytical sound. In short, it was awful. Soon after, the Telarc records became available, and while they had some definite virtues, they also had easily noticeable faults, which kept them from joining the top ranks of recordings. Then, of course, came the first generation of CD players. The first generation of CD players came out around 2 years after I opened my audio store in the early 1. I had no chance of becoming a dealer since the early models came from companies that preferred they weren't sold in a tiny specialty shop. As it turned out, it didn't matter because I was, once again, unimpressed by what I heard from these original players (and I wasn't alone of course). Still, I must emphasize that I was again prejudiced in favor of the early CD players, because of the hype, enthusiastic anecdotal evidence from some customers and the fact that these players weren't hybrids like digital records, but the purest form of this new technology. However, when a customer brought the first Sony player in my store and played it for me and some other people, I heard the same sonic problems I had heard before on the CBC. Some of the other customers heard what I did, but the owner of the player did not back down from his claim that the Sony was far superior to anything available in audio from the past, and that we just couldn't accept a . In the end, I didn't carry a CD player in my store until the late 1. This was because I could sell it without losing sleep.) In fact, my store ended up being the last analogue holdout in Toronto and my reputation for being an . Not only didn't this bother me at the time, I still feel some satisfaction to this day that I held out for that long, and feel history has proven that my digital- sceptic perspective was correct at that time. Later Experiences & My Website Dilemma. During the 1. 99. Digital sources improved somewhat during this time, but at a snail's pace. In my store, I primarily sold budget CD players, such as from NAD and Rega etc. The more expensive models which I heard, such as from Wadia, Manley etc, were better for sure, but they still did almost nothing for me, outside of disappointment. So I sold them either either used, meaning trade- ins (at large discounts of course), or as a special order. Then came the Internet explosion in the late 1. I soon realized would be both a challenge and an opportunity for me at the same time. Since I still owned an audio retail store when I began this website, I decided to both market the components I was representing while also posting all my audio and musical experiences I had the time to share. I even decided to include my audio philosophy and perspective on creating a deeply satisfying audio system. However, I had a serious problem when it came to the evaluation of Digital Sources, since I had limited experience with them and very little interest in catching up. Considering how many different subjects I felt I had to write about at the time, I decided to rely on my most trusted friends (. Since I trusted these people with my own purchases, I felt I could relay the same information and judgments they provided me to other audiophiles, even strangers, without the fear of being hypocritical. Accordingly, my Reference Digital Sources file ended up being dominated by my friends for something like 1. Shortly after I started the website, I left the audio business (and Canada) for good, but I decided to not only keep the website going, but to expand on it as far as my capabilities would allow. More Recent Years. For around 1. 5 years, I received regular updates about various Digital Players from my group of associates. My responsibilities were to flesh out, question, edit and expand on their reported observations, evaluations and results, in order to give them an understandable perspective, sense and continuity. During this period, there was also a transition from (dedicated) Redbook to CD/SACD players, which began in earnest in 2. Earlier, in 2. 00. Redbook Shootout, which included some of the finest players available. And, consistent with the history of this website, we had unambiguous (. Unsurprisingly, this article provoked a vicious attack on this website, myself personally and my associates personally. After these serial frustrating experiences, I decided there was no way I was going to invest in an expensive digital player myself, no matter what deal I could get using my audio connections. Then came 2. 01. 2, and I felt that maybe something now existed that I could finally take a serious risk with. The specific player that intrigued me was the latest generation, top- of- the- line, single- box CD/SACD player from Esoteric; The K- 0. The Esoteric K- 0. APL NWO- xxx ? The K- 0. I could want in a SACD/CD player. It had the best transport (Esoteric) ever made; the best available DAC chips (8 per channel!); it was in a single- box, making it practical for my current shelving and it even had a special input for Hi- Rez files from a computer, which reduced the chance of early obsolescence. There was only one serious problem; I couldn't afford it at its retail price of well over $ 2. My budget was around $ 1. There was the odd used K- 0. Audiogon, but still nowhere near my budget price. I wanted to hear, once and for all, . Then something happened which came completely out of the blue.. While waiting for a deal on the K- 0. I regularly made a Google search of it every few months, to keep up with K- 0. I could even get lucky and find one I could afford. While doing so, one website led to another, as usual, and somehow I ended up on the APL website. The first time this happened I left immediately because of my prior negative experiences (see below). However, the second time I landed there I decided to seriously check out the website, since there could be something of interest and value, regardless of the source. It was there that I discovered APL's NWO series of 8 modified Esoteric players that had come out periodically beginning in 2. NWO- 1, 2, 2. 5, 2. T, 3. GO, 3. SE, 4. SE and . I soon became enthusiastic myself until I discovered that the latest NWO- Master modification cost $ 2. Esoteric UX- 1 or X- 0. K- 0. 1 and, needless to say, ridiculously unaffordable for me. However, I still felt the need to investigate further, and the first issue was obvious: Whether or not the extra $ 1. To answer this question to my satisfaction (with no direct listening comparison possible), I broke down the two players into three sections; The Transport, the DAC and the Output Stage. The Esoteric K- 0. Design) Vs. The APL NWO- Master (Design)Transport- Basically the same for both. Movies - Salon. com.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |